There Would Not Have Been a Scientific Revolution Without the Catholic Church
Posted: 11 May 2009 05:09 PM   [ Ignore ]  
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  1835
Joined  2006-03-26

I never post in this section, but I thought you science nerds would appreciate this. Bill Donahue from the Catholic League (an organization that’s owned and run by him—and quite possibly only him) gets his face on FOX any chance he gets. Here he tells the two male hosts of FOX and Friends that the new Ron Howard film “Angels and Demons” based on Dan Brown’s book, is nothing but lies and that…are you ready for this?

there would not have been a scientific revolution without the Catholic church.

OK science buffs, is that the truth or a lie? Inquiring minds want to know. Plus, I plan on seeing this film.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lfhsbAV55gM

 Signature 

Bill Maher’s New Rule About Religious Tests for Office

Sam explains the difference between the belief in Elvis and belief in Jesus

Support the Separation of Church & State!
Freedom From Religion Foundation

Profile
 
 
Posted: 11 May 2009 05:56 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 1 ]  
Sr. Member
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  2927
Joined  2006-12-17
rab - 11 May 2009 09:09 PM

I never post in this section, but I thought you science nerds would appreciate this. Bill Donahue from the Catholic League (an organization that’s owned and run by him—and quite possibly only him) gets his face on FOX any chance he gets. Here he tells the two male hosts of FOX and Friends that the new Ron Howard film “Angels and Demons” based on Dan Brown’s book, is nothing but lies and that…are you ready for this?

there would not have been a scientific revolution without the Catholic church.

OK science buffs, is that the truth or a lie? Inquiring minds want to know. Plus, I plan on seeing this film.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lfhsbAV55gM

I would say yes and no.  There was almost a scientific revolution in the Islamic world but the fundamentalists won out and reason got demoted when compared to revelation.  There was another pre-scientific revolution taking place in China, which ran into problems because of the monolithic form of government they had (with other cultural factors as well).  So it’s pretty clear that there would have been a scientific revolution at some point somewhere.  On the other hand, the Catholic church tried to absorb reason into theology and so provided some fertile soil for development of science (which the church would have rooted out mercilessly had they realized what was going on).  One could also make an argument that it was also the decadence and corruption of the Renaissance popes that helped fuel the Reformation and this pushed the development of science (and note that after the 16th century the countries where science flourished were non-Catholic).

Profile
 
 
Posted: 11 May 2009 06:00 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 2 ]  
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  2492
Joined  2008-04-05

‘there would not have been a scientific revolution without the Catholic church.’

LOL. Actually, there was a scientific revolution in spite of the Catholic Church.

Wouldn’t we like to hear what Galileo, Descartes and many others would say about this comment.

[ Edited: 11 May 2009 06:02 PM by eudemonia]
 Signature 

‘Every reflecting mind must acknowledge that there is no proof of the existence of a Deity’

‘If ignorance of nature gave birth to gods, knowledge of nature destroys them’

Percy Bysshe Shelley

Profile
 
 
Posted: 11 May 2009 06:14 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 3 ]  
Administrator
Avatar
RankRankRank
Total Posts:  496
Joined  2005-02-22

He’s right, you know. Without the Catholic Church, a revolution would not have been necessary.

 Signature 

Delude responsibly.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 12 May 2009 06:27 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 4 ]  
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  1814
Joined  2006-11-10

I think this falls under the post hoc ergo proctor hoc group of fallacies.
Because at one point virtually all Europeans were Catholic, all the later virtues of Europe can be attributed to the church.

By the same logic there wouldn’t have been the Olympic games without the practice of slavery.

Reasoning of this kind lacks the specificity of a good argument.

And Bill Donahue is clinically insane.

 Signature 

“You know I’m born to lose, and gambling is for fools.
But that’s the way I like it baby, I don’t want to live forever.”

From the autobiography of A.A.Mills, ‘The passage of time, according to an estranged, casual tyrant.’

Profile
 
 
Posted: 12 May 2009 03:07 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 5 ]  
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  1835
Joined  2006-03-26
Nhoj Morley - 11 May 2009 10:14 PM

He’s right, you know. Without the Catholic Church, a revolution would not have been necessary.

I thought the same thing.

 Signature 

Bill Maher’s New Rule About Religious Tests for Office

Sam explains the difference between the belief in Elvis and belief in Jesus

Support the Separation of Church & State!
Freedom From Religion Foundation

Profile
 
 
   
 
 
RSS 2.0     Atom Feed