Lunar Orbiter Maps Apollo Landing Sites
Posted: 17 July 2009 02:00 PM   [ Ignore ]  
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  1183
Joined  2007-08-07

Lunar Reconnaisance Orbiter maps Apollo Landing Sites


Hard to believe we were there 40 years ago and we lost the will to make something of it.  Penny-wise, pound foolish humanity…

Phil Plait of Bad Astronomy writes:

This is so so so freaking cool: the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter has taken pictures of the Apollo landing sites!

Holy Haleakala!

That’s EXACTLY how I pictured it would look. That picture shows the lower half of the Lunar Module, the part that stayed behind on the Moon when Armstrong and Aldrin blasted back up off the surface. It was essentially dead weight, so the LM was designed to split in half, with the top half (the aptly-named Ascent Module — click on the diagram on the right for details) going back up into orbit to meet with Michael Collins in the Command Module. From there they returned to Earth.

The Descent Module is about 4 meters or so across, and the image, above taken when the Sun was low on the horizon, clearly shows the DM and its shadow cast across the lunar surface. The region where they landed was fairly smooth, so the module is the only thing large enough in the image to cast an appreciable shadow.

Wow. Look at that! Physical, tangible evidence that human beings walked on the surface of the Moon. And not just that: we did it again and again. Behold!

That’s the Apollo 14 landing site, and you can see where the lunar surface was disturbed by the astronauts bootprints! Some of that may also be tracks from a wheelbarrow-like device called the Modularized Equipment Transporter which Alan Shepherd and Edgar Mitchell used to help them carry equipment and samples to and from the lander.

Oh man oh man oh man! And mind you, these pictures are not even the highest resolution LRO can provide; future observation will have twice this much detail!

I love this. Not because I needed proof we went, of course. But there is just something about seeing new pictures after all these years. Apollo may seem like ancient history, but those artifacts on the Moon are still sitting there, in many ways as fresh as the day they were placed there.

In all of human history, there are many dividing lines we can arbitrarily assign. Before and after the use of atomic weapons, before and after the discovery of the light bulb, before and after this war or that.

But there is one dividing line that can inspire us, fill us with wonder, make us dream of bigger goals, higher aspirations, better ways to live our lives for the future. And that is the dividing line between the time we were a race shackled to the ground, confined to a single planet… and the time a human being stepped foot on another world.

And there it is, in pictures and in fact. This is what these pictures mean. We humans spend a lot of time looking around, looking out, looking down. But sometimes, for just a brief moment, we look up. We did it once before, and it’s time to do it again.

Link to Full Article with Pics

 Signature 

Faith-free since 1985

Profile
 
 
Posted: 17 July 2009 10:15 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 1 ]  
Sr. Member
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  1044
Joined  2008-02-15

That is more moon faker bullshit, footprints wouldn’t still be there after all this time!

 Signature 

Why is there Something instead of Nothing: No reason or ever knowable reason.

Kissing Hank’s Ass
Pope Song (rated NC17).

Profile
 
 
Posted: 18 July 2009 03:56 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 2 ]  
Administrator
Avatar
RankRankRank
Total Posts:  950
Joined  2006-06-26
GAD - 18 July 2009 02:15 AM

That is more moon faker bullshit, footprints wouldn’t still be there after all this time!

They certainly would, since there is nothing like wind or water to erode them. Unless there is a nearby impact that produces enough ejecta to cover it up, they will be there for a long time. Basic geology and physics.

 Signature 

“We have it recorded in a book called the Bible.”

To be blunt, the Bible records all manner of silly shit.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 18 July 2009 05:12 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 3 ]  
Sr. Member
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  1044
Joined  2008-02-15
dlsmith - 18 July 2009 07:56 PM
GAD - 18 July 2009 02:15 AM

That is more moon faker bullshit, footprints wouldn’t still be there after all this time!

They certainly would, since there is nothing like wind or water to erode them. Unless there is a nearby impact that produces enough ejecta to cover it up, they will be there for a long time. Basic geology and physics.

You know that was a joke right? Did you see the Fox moonfakers tv show (2001?)? Or the Mythbusters episode where they busted the myth that you can’t make footprints on the moon?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo_Moon_Landing_hoax_accusations

 Signature 

Why is there Something instead of Nothing: No reason or ever knowable reason.

Kissing Hank’s Ass
Pope Song (rated NC17).

Profile
 
 
   
 
 
RSS 2.0     Atom Feed