Ute beauty: $1.5m to promote Jesus
Posted: 23 August 2009 05:59 AM   [ Ignore ]  
Newbie
Avatar
Rank
Total Posts:  40
Joined  2007-01-06

Ute beauty: $1.5m to promote Jesus

CHRISTIAN churches are getting ready to launch Australia’s biggest cross-denominational media campaign, featuring the ultimate pin-up boy: Jesus Christ.

Bible Society chief executive Daniel Willis said a seven-week campaign in NSW would be a non-traditional approach for Christian churches, which he said had never used the media well.

‘‘Research showed us that people were not really happy about the church,’’ he said. ‘‘When we started this research in 2003, all the problems that were associated with the church were being raised, and there was a lot of bad press. The church was anathema but Jesus was fine.’‘

The $1.5 million ‘‘Jesus. All About Life’’ campaign will kick off with a viral internet component next month, before moving on to prime-time TV and billboard advertising running until the end of October. Although privately funded, it has the support of a range of denominations, including the Catholic Church, NSW Christian Brethren and Hillsong.

Mr Willis said the campaign would not shy away from the reality that some people had had negative experiences with Christian churches, but Jesus - who had stood up to religious leaders and those using the church for financial gain - ‘‘stands up to scrutiny’‘. ‘‘We acknowledge that some people have been dealt a rough deal by the church but Jesus, when he was here and was talking to people, he cut through all that as well,’’ he said.

Increased church attendance would be one of the markers of success, he said. Although 12.7 million Australians identified themselves as Christian in the last census, only 8 per cent attended services regularly.

Faced with a similar image problem, the Church of England in Britain has rebranded its churches as friendly places.

The church has published a book, Everybody Welcome, advising the clergy to consider that some parishioners have ‘‘special needs’‘, such as the bald, short people, the colour-blind - and readers of tabloid newspapers.

‘‘Some pew spaces are inadequate for what is known in church circles as ‘the wider community,’‘’ it read.

http://www.smh.com.au/national/ute-beau ... -euec.html

$1.5m to “flog” Jesus. It did not cost the Romans that.
Why is that money not being spent on the POOR, the SICK and the HOMELESS.

[ Edited: 23 August 2009 06:03 AM by eccles]
 Signature 

em hotep

Rev. Robert Tobin (Minister, First Church of Atheism)
Thank “god” I am Atheist grin

Profile
 
 
Posted: 25 August 2009 07:15 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 1 ]  
Administrator
Avatar
RankRankRank
Total Posts:  950
Joined  2006-06-26
eccles - 23 August 2009 09:59 AM

$1.5m to “flog” Jesus. It did not cost the Romans that.
Why is that money not being spent on the POOR, the SICK and the HOMELESS.

That’s a question I often ask some of my Christian friends. How can they rationalize building a new $5 million addition to their church when there are desperately poor people in the community that they could use that money to help. Mostly I get nonsense answers about them needing the space or that the building is a testament to the glory of god or some such bullshit.

 Signature 

“We have it recorded in a book called the Bible.”

To be blunt, the Bible records all manner of silly shit.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 25 August 2009 08:51 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 2 ]  
Member
Avatar
RankRankRank
Total Posts:  363
Joined  2006-04-05
dlsmith - 25 August 2009 11:15 AM
eccles - 23 August 2009 09:59 AM

$1.5m to “flog” Jesus. It did not cost the Romans that.
Why is that money not being spent on the POOR, the SICK and the HOMELESS.

That’s a question I often ask some of my Christian friends. How can they rationalize building a new $5 million addition to their church when there are desperately poor people in the community that they could use that money to help. Mostly I get nonsense answers about them needing the space or that the building is a testament to the glory of god or some such bullshit.

Those same believers are generally blind to the fact that Mother Teresa used much of the money given to her not to help the poor, but to fund a new order of nuns (named after herself) as well as building and furnishing plenty of religious structures.

 Signature 

“It isn’t paranoia- it’s a heightened awareness of reality.” —our resident conspiracy theorist takes a stand!

Profile
 
 
   
 
 
RSS 2.0     Atom Feed