The New Morality
Posted: 25 April 2011 08:00 AM   [ Ignore ]  
Member
Avatar
RankRankRank
Total Posts:  802
Joined  2010-11-12

Let’s say that our scientists are able to isolate morality and completely understand its origins and underpinnings.
Will that understanding change morality?

Profile
 
 
Posted: 26 April 2011 08:54 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 1 ]  
Sr. Member
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  1044
Joined  2008-02-15
toombaru - 25 April 2011 12:00 PM

Let’s say that our scientists are able to isolate morality and completely understand its origins and underpinnings.
Will that understanding change morality?

No, people will still believe in objective morality.

 Signature 

Why is there Something instead of Nothing: No reason or ever knowable reason.

Kissing Hank’s Ass
Pope Song (rated NC17).

Profile
 
 
Posted: 27 April 2011 08:41 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 2 ]  
Member
Avatar
RankRankRank
Total Posts:  802
Joined  2010-11-12
GAD - 27 April 2011 12:54 AM
toombaru - 25 April 2011 12:00 PM

Let’s say that our scientists are able to isolate morality and completely understand its origins and underpinnings.
Will that understanding change morality?

No, people will still believe in objective morality.


I was wondering what would happen to morality if humans in general were to comprehend that there was no such thing.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 27 April 2011 09:20 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 3 ]  
Sr. Member
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  1044
Joined  2008-02-15
toombaru - 27 April 2011 12:41 PM
GAD - 27 April 2011 12:54 AM
toombaru - 25 April 2011 12:00 PM

Let’s say that our scientists are able to isolate morality and completely understand its origins and underpinnings.
Will that understanding change morality?

No, people will still believe in objective morality.


I was wondering what would happen to morality if humans in general were to comprehend that there was no such thing.

Nothing would happen to morality = the consensus of personal preferences of a group = moral relativism.

The issue that people have trouble with is if morality is subjective then how can we hold people accountable, my answer, the same way we do now.

 Signature 

Why is there Something instead of Nothing: No reason or ever knowable reason.

Kissing Hank’s Ass
Pope Song (rated NC17).

Profile
 
 
Posted: 27 April 2011 09:29 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 4 ]  
Member
Avatar
RankRankRank
Total Posts:  802
Joined  2010-11-12
GAD - 27 April 2011 01:20 PM
toombaru - 27 April 2011 12:41 PM
GAD - 27 April 2011 12:54 AM
toombaru - 25 April 2011 12:00 PM

Let’s say that our scientists are able to isolate morality and completely understand its origins and underpinnings.
Will that understanding change morality?

No, people will still believe in objective morality.


I was wondering what would happen to morality if humans in general were to comprehend that there was no such thing.

Nothing would happen to morality = the consensus of personal preferences of a group = moral relativism.

The issue that people have trouble with is if morality is subjective then how can we hold people accountable, my answer, the same way we do now.


Should people be held accountable if there is no free will?

Profile
 
 
Posted: 27 April 2011 09:45 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 5 ]  
Sr. Member
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  1044
Joined  2008-02-15
toombaru - 27 April 2011 01:29 PM
GAD - 27 April 2011 01:20 PM
toombaru - 27 April 2011 12:41 PM
GAD - 27 April 2011 12:54 AM
toombaru - 25 April 2011 12:00 PM

Let’s say that our scientists are able to isolate morality and completely understand its origins and underpinnings.
Will that understanding change morality?

No, people will still believe in objective morality.


I was wondering what would happen to morality if humans in general were to comprehend that there was no such thing.

Nothing would happen to morality = the consensus of personal preferences of a group = moral relativism.

The issue that people have trouble with is if morality is subjective then how can we hold people accountable, my answer, the same way we do now.


Should people be held accountable if there is no free will?

The argument/claim that without freewill people can’t be held accountable for their actions is a tired one. My answer, if people can’t be held accountable for their actions then I can’t be held accountable for holding them accountable for their actions.

 Signature 

Why is there Something instead of Nothing: No reason or ever knowable reason.

Kissing Hank’s Ass
Pope Song (rated NC17).

Profile
 
 
Posted: 27 April 2011 09:59 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 6 ]  
Member
Avatar
RankRankRank
Total Posts:  802
Joined  2010-11-12
GAD - 27 April 2011 01:45 PM
toombaru - 27 April 2011 01:29 PM
GAD - 27 April 2011 01:20 PM
toombaru - 27 April 2011 12:41 PM
GAD - 27 April 2011 12:54 AM
toombaru - 25 April 2011 12:00 PM

Let’s say that our scientists are able to isolate morality and completely understand its origins and underpinnings.
Will that understanding change morality?

No, people will still believe in objective morality.


I was wondering what would happen to morality if humans in general were to comprehend that there was no such thing.

Nothing would happen to morality = the consensus of personal preferences of a group = moral relativism.

The issue that people have trouble with is if morality is subjective then how can we hold people accountable, my answer, the same way we do now.


Should people be held accountable if there is no free will?

The argument/claim that without freewill people can’t be held accountable for their actions is a tired one. My answer, if people can’t be held accountable for their actions then I can’t be held accountable for holding them accountable for their actions.

Then perhaps you should coin a new word for “accountable”.

grin

Profile
 
 
Posted: 27 April 2011 10:37 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 7 ]  
Sr. Member
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  1044
Joined  2008-02-15

Interesting article on freewill was just posted. I disagree with the conclusions, but still interesting.

Zeno’s Paradox and the Problem of Free Will

 Signature 

Why is there Something instead of Nothing: No reason or ever knowable reason.

Kissing Hank’s Ass
Pope Song (rated NC17).

Profile
 
 
Posted: 27 April 2011 05:27 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 8 ]  
Member
Avatar
RankRankRank
Total Posts:  651
Joined  2006-12-08
toombaru - 27 April 2011 01:29 PM

Should people be held accountable if there is no free will?

Of course! In fact, the “No Free Will” argument is the best possible argument in favor of holding people accountable. Think about it in terms of influencing future behavior rather than punishment for past behavior.

 Signature 

Do-gooding is like treating hemophilia—the real cure is to let hemophiliacs bleed to death, before they breed more hemophiliacs. -Robert Heinlein, Stranger in a Strange Land

Profile
 
 
Posted: 27 April 2011 05:36 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 9 ]  
Sr. Member
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  3765
Joined  2007-03-11
Antisocialdarwinist - 27 April 2011 09:27 PM
toombaru - 27 April 2011 01:29 PM

Should people be held accountable if there is no free will?

Of course! In fact, the “No Free Will” argument is the best possible argument in favor of holding people accountable. Think about it in terms of influencing future behavior rather than punishment for past behavior.

Yeah, accountability is more a matter of behavior modification than it is objective morality.  If a person is acting anti-socially (no pun on your name intended) then his behavior needs to be modified so he can live in society without disrupting everyone else’s life.  If his behavior cannot be modified, then he’s locked up for life or institutionalized, etc.  The issue is how to do this without impinging unnecessarily on freedom, and this is always a balancing act.  But if you are considering behavior in the absence of deity, then there is no objective, universal morality, and you have to dance the moral relativism dance.  And dancing always requires good balance.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 27 April 2011 06:26 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 10 ]  
Member
Avatar
RankRankRank
Total Posts:  802
Joined  2010-11-12
GAD - 27 April 2011 02:37 PM

Interesting article on freewill was just posted. I disagree with the conclusions, but still interesting.

Zeno’s Paradox and the Problem of Free Will


Current research proves that the sense of self is an illusion.
Factor out the self and the question about free will becomes moot.

[ Edited: 27 April 2011 08:09 PM by toombaru]
Profile
 
 
   
 
 
RSS 2.0     Atom Feed