BlackLight - 06 July 2011 07:12 AM
We needn’t dismiss the studies published in recent years that seem to suggest circumcised males are somewhat less at risk for certain STDs than are uncircumcised males. It just strikes me as a procedure that an adult male can choose to have done to himself, should he wish.
Baptism is much more harmful than circumcision.
Males can function fairly well without a foreskin.
When one’s critical thinking is surgically
removed and the brain is doused in magical thinking
the person is condemned to a fantasy nether-world composed of
hope, fear and delusion.