One really strange thing is its quixotic defence of the King James Bible!!
For example, it regards the “rumour” that K.J. was homosexual as an untrue slander in order to cast doubts on the Bible translation he ordered.
So, evidently, the author argues, James wasn’t homosexual, and then veers off to talk about Guy Fawkes.
As a matter of fact, K.J. WAS homosexual.
What sort of religious relevance that might have on anything, is beyond me.
