Marriage
Posted: 01 December 2007 01:11 PM   [ Ignore ]  
Member
Avatar
RankRankRank
Total Posts:  528
Joined  2007-10-24

Is marriage necessary, in your opinion? Why or why not?

Also, what is your view on government involvement in marriage? If we are to have a truly secular government, and marriage itself is a religious union between two people, then why should the secular government have any involvement in marriage? Isn’t the government overstepping its secular bounds by getting involved in marriage?

And lastly, should the government be able to dictate who can and cannot get married? If there is a religion which accepts homosexuals, for example, and the government is a secular government, then what right has the government to refuse their marriage? Another church may choose not to accept their marriage, but they don’t attend that church, so it doesn’t matter if the government were truly secular.

[ Edited: 01 December 2007 01:14 PM by Yahun]
Profile
 
 
Posted: 01 December 2007 08:20 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 1 ]  
Jr. Member
Avatar
RankRank
Total Posts:  80
Joined  2006-12-13
Yahun - 01 December 2007 06:11 PM

Is marriage necessary, in your opinion?

Necessary for what, exactly? It’s a nice flag around which the American Family Association can rally.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 03 December 2007 07:55 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 2 ]  
Sr. Member
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  3208
Joined  2007-04-26
Yahun - 01 December 2007 06:11 PM

Also, what is your view on government involvement in marriage? If we are to have a truly secular government, and marriage itself is a religious union between two people, then why should the secular government have any involvement in marriage? Isn’t the government overstepping its secular bounds by getting involved in marriage?

Marriage is not inherently a religious institution. If religion and government didn’t exist, couples might still form lifelong bonds. Some couples choose to have civil ceremonies only, and there’s nothing wrong with that. A civil marriage is really a contract that gives each spouse certain rights and responsibilities, and I emphasize the latter. There are benefits to both the couple and society to having these legally codified. Which leads to my second point…

Yahun - 01 December 2007 06:11 PM

And lastly, should the government be able to dictate who can and cannot get married? If there is a religion which accepts homosexuals, for example, and the government is a secular government, then what right has the government to refuse their marriage? Another church may choose not to accept their marriage, but they don’t attend that church, so it doesn’t matter if the government were truly secular.

Government has no compelling interest in denying civil marriage to same-sex couples. In my experience, the religious arguments against gay marriage come down to some claim about the will of deity, and there’s no evidence for such claims. And conservative believers often throw in Chicken Little claims about gay marriage leading to the destruction of straight marriage. It sounds like they expect straight men everywhere to leave their families and elope with Raoul the hunky poolboy.

There is only one argument against gay marriage that is worth serious consideration, and that is the claim that civil marriage is for the protection of children. The high court in Maryland recently used that reasoning to rule against gay marriage. (I give the court credit for not succumbing to the Chicken Little mentality. Although the court’s answer to gay marriage was no, it was a rather weak no, partly because it passed the final responsibility to the legislature.) Although the protection of children is one of the purposes of marriage, it is not the only purpose. Any legal argument around the “protection of children” claim would also result in infertile couples having no right to marry.

Not only does government have no compelling interest to ban same-sex marriage, voters have no right to ban it either through referendum, and legislators have no right to ban it through legislation. Private behavior that doesn’t harm others is no one else’s business - not government’s, not society’s, not the community’s, not the neighbors’, and not even the family’s.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 03 December 2007 09:07 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 3 ]  
Member
Avatar
RankRankRank
Total Posts:  805
Joined  2007-08-28

“Private behavior that doesn’t harm others is no one else’s business - not government’s, not society’s, not the community’s, not the neighbors’, and not even the family’s.”

At what age does private behavior become a right?

Profile
 
 
Posted: 03 December 2007 09:31 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 4 ]  
Member
Avatar
RankRankRank
Total Posts:  765
Joined  2006-08-16
Yahun - 01 December 2007 06:11 PM

If we are to have a truly secular government, and marriage itself is a religious union between two people, then why should the secular government have any involvement in marriage? Isn’t the government overstepping its secular bounds by getting involved in marriage?

As soon as people began assigning secular rights such as inheritance and child custody based on marital status, marriage ceased being a religious union.

 Signature 

“Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.” - Voltaire

“Rational arguments do not work on religious people, otherwise there would be no religious people.”—Dr. House

Profile
 
 
Posted: 03 December 2007 09:48 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 5 ]  
Sr. Member
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  5404
Joined  2006-09-27
mcalpine - 03 December 2007 02:07 PM

“Private behavior that doesn’t harm others is no one else’s business - not government’s, not society’s, not the community’s, not the neighbors’, and not even the family’s.”

At what age does private behavior become a right?

As soon as you claim it. When did you stop confessing your masturbatory fantasies to your friends and family?

 Signature 

INVEST in cynicism!

Profile
 
 
Posted: 03 December 2007 10:29 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 6 ]  
Member
Avatar
RankRankRank
Total Posts:  805
Joined  2007-08-28

“As soon as you claim it.”

Good answer.

Profile
 
 
   
 
 
RSS 2.0     Atom Feed