Wisdom in Perspective
Posted: 20 April 2007 06:46 AM   [ Ignore ]  
Newbie
Rank
Total Posts:  5
Joined  2007-04-20

The following website has a book, Wisdom in Perspective, that explains/justifies naturalism and atheism. The ebook is available online for free (click on cover on main page). On this website, there are also articles on human consciousness, etc.

www.excaliburbooks.com

Profile
 
 
Posted: 26 April 2007 06:24 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 1 ]  
Newbie
Rank
Total Posts:  35
Joined  2007-03-26

tx say hey sicjedi, thx for the heads-up on this curious book.
and welcome to sam’s place! hope you like it here. )
.
“Simply put, wisdom is the interaction of intelligence, knowledge, and
perspective.”

“When it comes down to it, your wisdom depends on what you believe
for if your thoughts and actions are not based upon reality, then neither
is your wisdom.”

The personal sense of certainty, confidence, or assurance that you possess
is “most often determined by your perceptions, experience, and reasoning”.
.
—quotes from ‘Wisdom in Perspective’ by Bret Alan Hughes
.
Although the book as a whole is a fine example of what sophiology can
accomplish, the book is not without certain flaws. For example, the weakest
part of the book is surely the way it ends. In the final concluding chapter eight
(‘Pulling it all together and coming up with wisdom’) the author presents what
I call the ‘matrix-argument’. if you recall, in the movie people are housed in
interactive-pods and fed a simulated-reality by the self-aware computer network
called the matrix. Thus Hughes argues that since it’s conceivable that our brains
could be fed false-data, we can never have absolute certainty about any of our
knowledge. To me, this argument is no improvement over Descartes idea of a
demon feeding him false impressions and experiences. Just because the matrix
is conceivable does not make it plausible. So while I agree that *absolute*
certainty is impossible, I do not agree that recognition of this epistemological
fact is the “deepest foundation of human wisdom” (p.97). In any case, Hughes
seems to think that wisdom arises chiefly from a sense of (or awareness of)
how ignorant and how lucky we all really are. I would say, to the contrary, that
these three factors are simply the basic prerequisites for wisdom, and not the
basic substance of wisdom. what is the basic substance of wisdom then? that’s
easy! “A deep conviction that underlies the faith of our fathers is the belief in
‘Ma’at’ - the search for truth and justice.”—Queen Tiy (in ‘Akhenaten the Man
who Inspired Moses’).
.
8)

Profile
 
 
Posted: 26 April 2007 10:56 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 2 ]  
Sr. Member
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  2807
Joined  2005-04-29

But textman, let’s hope you come up with what Walliser was not able to after years of pondering: a decent title. (We’re counting on you, buddy.)

 Signature 

Philosophy may in no way interfere with the actual use of language; it can in the end only describe it. For it cannot give it any foundations either. It leaves everything as it is.
Ludwig Wittgenstein

Profile
 
 
Posted: 26 April 2007 12:36 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 3 ]  
Newbie
Rank
Total Posts:  35
Joined  2007-03-26

.
who said i work best under pressure? urrrr
.
well, here’s a few possibles just off the top of my head
.
Wisdom Comes of Age
.
The Great Ma’at Revolution
.
The Inertia of Tradition
.
howzat?  wink
.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 26 April 2007 05:16 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 4 ]  
Sr. Member
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  2807
Joined  2005-04-29

I don’t know, textman. But if things ever got that far, let’s hope you’d be available as the key editorial consultant. That would be my vote, at least.

 Signature 

Philosophy may in no way interfere with the actual use of language; it can in the end only describe it. For it cannot give it any foundations either. It leaves everything as it is.
Ludwig Wittgenstein

Profile
 
 
   
 
 
RSS 2.0     Atom Feed