Ph.D.s who ostracize
Posted: 06 March 2005 03:28 AM   [ Ignore ]  
Member
RankRankRank
Total Posts:  128
Joined  2005-02-23

A fundamentalist Christian friend of mine sent me a link to an article the other day, and I found it interesting enough to offer it here for your comment. Here's how he introduced the article:

Dave, in an earlier exchange I explained modern scientists as being high priests of the new religion to which all are
required to pay lip service. I thought you might be interested in the following article.
 


Any thoughts?

Dave

[/url]

Profile
 
 
Posted: 06 March 2005 04:41 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 1 ]  
Member
RankRankRank
Total Posts:  635
Joined  2005-02-06

Dave….It’s a little aggravating to to see all the complaints of ID persecution, isn’t it.  To be a scientist requires use of the scientific method and that just does not allow us to see gaps in knowledge and say “God did it”. (Or I could have used it on a lot of exams :D)

Later,  Rod

Profile
 
 
Posted: 19 March 2005 12:17 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 2 ]  
Member
RankRankRank
Total Posts:  128
Joined  2005-02-23

I agree, Rod. For what it’s worth, I responded to my friend in this way:

Just keep in mind that Dr. Sternberg committed a mortal sin in the eyes of certain of his colleagues. Let’s pretend you’re the editor of a science magazine—say, Cardio-Vascular Investigations—and up to now no one has been able to document a mechanism that explains how it is that heart muscle has the tendency to beat. Leg muscle just won’t beat, even when it’s cut up into the shape of a heart and hooked up to a heart’s nerves, valves, arteries, etc. One day you get a submission for an article whose author explains that the reason heart muscle beats is that every heart of every animal in the world contains a tiny version of Elvis Presley, tapping his toes and swinging his hips.

I suspect you can see where I’m going here. I understand the historical significance of religious faith, but many serious scientists consider religion to be childish nonsense on the level of Santa Claus and the Tooth Fairy. Whether you agree with them or not, deistic notions do not fit into their world, and certainly not in their very serious publications.

By the way, Scott, “Darwinist” is somewhat of a misnomer in the sense that it shouldn’t be taken too literally. I don’t adjust monkeys with a monkey wrench and modern Darwinists understand that Darwin’s most brilliant achievement was to get the bio-ball rolling in certain directions. His writings contain many errors and misconceived notions, and his theories continue to be updated.

He called me a few days later and we’re still friends.

Dave

Profile
 
 
   
 
 
RSS 2.0     Atom Feed