"There also seems to be a body of data attesting to the reality of psychic phenomena, much of which has been ignored by mainstream science." (The End of Faith, p. 41.)
I was, I dunno, somewhat taken aback by Mr Harris's ostensible deviation from a strict-rationality diet. There seems to be a body of data attesting to the reality of stigmata and weeping icons too. It's just that none of the data is any good once you drag it into the daylight. Anybody else find this surprising, maybe inapposite?
In just about every other respect, I'm wholly in agreement with Letter to a Christian Nation and The End of Faith.