I am unsure how your own definition of arrogance does not apply to yourself. Implying that people who disagree with you are ...
Quite frankly, more often than not that’s just an attempt to “disallow” any disagreement by simply relabeling the substance presented, to mere “disagreement”. It’s a pretty transparent slight of mind trick that only works on those who very much want it to, and who have a sufficient capacity for self-deception to pull it off (i.e. those who can pull off a significant degree of actual, rather than rhetorical, faith). The substance presented is all still there, but the apologist has replaced all the substance with “disagreement” (ideally at least—when, on and for whom it actually works). Church-going believers tend to be well conditioned to accept such sleights of mind in favor of their franchise’s approved religious notions. It’s almost a guarantee most of them will experience multiple instances from the pulpit on a weekly basis.
