The Covenant of Avraham

 
Dumaya
 
Avatar
 
 
Dumaya
Total Posts:  124
Joined  04-05-2017
 
 
 
11 July 2017 17:47
 

COCK-BUTCHERING.

...There!  I said it!  Screw your “offence”!  I’m out and proud!  I named names!  I called out the Devil by His title!  I broke the Voldermort’s spell!  FREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEDOMMMMMMMMMMMMM!!

*recomposes self*

A hackneyed harranguing of what are literally endless inconsistencies, incongruities, ‘irreconcilabilities’, contradictions, hypocrisies, asininities and patently pea-brained promulgations of religion, would be treading over a track long beaten into fine, desiccated, holy desert dust.  Thus, the leave-your-brain-at-the-door, ‘path of least neural resistance’ schmatta shtick of religion, is not the dead horse carcass I am looking to flog here, my fellow Gungan Jedi Academy rejects.

What I instead seek is a solution to this specific, Age-old ‘riddle of the shmecky’:


HOW DOES ONE QUALIFY THE NOTION OF AN INDEFECTABLE, INFALLIBLE, OMNISCIENT ENTITY — THE VERY DEFINITION OF THE HUMAN WORD ‘PERFECT’ — AN ‘IMMENSITY’ WHO, WITHIN COMPREHENSIBLE HUMAN COGNITION AND BEYOND, ASCENDS ANY ERROR AND ALL REPROACH — IN EVERY CONCEIVABLE WAY — SOMEHOW, SOME WAY, SEEMINGLY SUFFERS FROM AN ABJECT INABILITY TO CONJURE A WORKING INCARNATION OF THE MALE PUDENDA — SUCH THAT HIS WORK IS NOT IN IMMEDIATE, DIRE AND EXIGENT NEED OF POST-NATAL MUTILATION—AT THE CUMBERSOME, SIMIAN, BARELY-PREHENSILE PAWS OF HIS FLAWED-BY-DESIGN, SIN SOUSED, VAINGLORIOUS, ARROGANT CHILDREN…!?


Let it be know:  I am here to be enlightened.  I am a tableau rasa that lays supine for etching.  I yearn for the intellectually emancipating embrace of “His” logic and reason.  I submit myself to the injection of “His” ineffable intelligence.  I supplicate for the de-obfuscation of this miasma of mordant, misguided doubt that diabolically clouds man’s mind.  Esuriently, I salivate to sup upon our saviour’s sap of supra-sentience.  O, Lord!  Silence the chorus of cynicism that every nescient, neural fibre croons in concert to deave mine ears to thy immaculate, ecclesiastical refrain of ethereal edification.  I - LONG - TO - BE - SAVED!!

tl;dr / u wot, m8?!
“God” is the embodiment of perfection, but “He(o, the irony!) cannot correctly construct a damn cock!  We profess to love our children, but then subject them to unashamëd inguinal torture — whilst in their nadir of vulnerability — and then discursively excuse our sadism through shallow verbiage of “rights” and “culture”.  We elevate “God” above all human foibles, yet we must cede to “His” seeming base, penile prepuce fetishism.  The Judaic origins of this barbarism, even involve the oral exsanguination of the infant’s gaping wound—by its surgical-scimitar-wielding aggressor (“metzitzah b’peh”).  An Islamic variant that unarguably further cements the uniform, strident phallocentricty of its own already primordial interpretation of the pertaining dogma.  The Christian copycats in-ironic dedication to this cruel child abuse, paradoxically reconciled with their absurd notions of ‘pro-life’ and anti-abortion catatonia.

Then, the increasing empirical evidence of circumcision contributing to the societal pervasion of a pornographic culture, and the ensuing prevalence of “gonzo” extremes; which ingravescently strive to sate the [thus] scarred, stultified male sexual insatiability — inherently promoting an undercurrent of misogyny — exacerbating what is finally being confronted as an already fundamentally incompatible male-female sexual satisfaction (compare: procreation) dynamic…
Why - is - this - all - still - allowed?!

inb4 ‘lunatics are running the asylum’ ¯\(v_v)/¯

[ Edited: 24 July 2017 04:30 by Dumaya]
 
bbearren
 
Avatar
 
 
bbearren
Total Posts:  2905
Joined  20-11-2013
 
 
 
11 July 2017 19:04
 
Dumaya - 11 July 2017 05:47 PM

Let it be know:

Did you mean “known”?

 
 
GAD
 
Avatar
 
 
GAD
Total Posts:  15843
Joined  15-02-2008
 
 
 
11 July 2017 21:21
 

Looks like a bad case of foreskin fever resulting in gonorrhea of the mouth, delusions of penis grandeur and maniacal mental masturbation.

 
 
Nhoj Morley
 
Avatar
 
 
Nhoj Morley
Total Posts:  5498
Joined  22-02-2005
 
 
 
11 July 2017 22:13
 

We need to be better prepared for emergencies like this one. Mart is taking a course in mental first aid.

Splints and bandages will be made available. Patrons can rent a low-cost Lobe Funnel to keep the frontal lobe from scratching and licking the rest of the brain.

This is all friendly joviality, of course…

 
Dumaya
 
Avatar
 
 
Dumaya
Total Posts:  124
Joined  04-05-2017
 
 
 
12 July 2017 06:37
 
bbearren - 11 July 2017 07:04 PM
Dumaya - 11 July 2017 05:47 PM

Let it be know:

Did you mean “known”?

No.  In the context of my rant, it was definitely “know”.

 
Cheshire Cat
 
Avatar
 
 
Cheshire Cat
Total Posts:  755
Joined  01-11-2014
 
 
 
12 July 2017 11:16
 

I guess behind all of Dumaya’s verbal dancing, is the idea that circumcision is form of genital mutilation based on archaic religious practices going back to Bronze Age Jews. I can see how a case could be made for this.

I’ve read that men who were uncircumcised most of their adult lives, and who then had it done, describe the difference in sexual feeling as the difference between a color photograph versus a black and white one – the sensations had been terribly muted.

I had it done when I was an infant since it was standard practice in America in the 1950’s. I don’t know if it still is. The idea was that bacteria could hide in the foreskin and cause health issues. I’m not sure if this is still considered to be true or not.

[ Edited: 12 July 2017 11:27 by Cheshire Cat]
 
 
Jan_CAN
 
Avatar
 
 
Jan_CAN
Total Posts:  1355
Joined  21-10-2016
 
 
 
12 July 2017 12:16
 
Cheshire Cat - 12 July 2017 11:16 AM

I guess behind all of Dumaya’s verbal dancing, is the idea that circumcision is form of genital mutilation based on archaic religious practices going back to Bronze Age Jews. I can see how a case could be made for this.

I’ve read that men who were uncircumcised most of their adult lives, and who then had it done, describe the difference in sexual feeling as the difference between a color photograph versus a black and white one – the sensations had been terribly muted.

I had it done when I was an infant since it was standard practice in America in the 1950’s. I don’t know if it still is. The idea was that bacteria could hide in the foreskin and cause health issues. I’m not sure if this is still considered to be true or not.

It’s not only relevant to men’s health, but also their partner’s health, possibly.

Male Circumcision Cuts Women’s Cervical Cancer Risk
Study Shows Circumcision May Help Reduce Spread of HPV

 

 

 
 
Cheshire Cat
 
Avatar
 
 
Cheshire Cat
Total Posts:  755
Joined  01-11-2014
 
 
 
12 July 2017 12:27
 
Jan_CAN - 12 July 2017 12:16 PM

It’s not only relevant to men’s health, but also their partner’s health, possibly.

Male Circumcision Cuts Women’s Cervical Cancer Risk
Study Shows Circumcision May Help Reduce Spread of HPV

This is good news then.
I don’t mind giving up a little intensity of feeling as long as it’s for the benefit of all the lovely women who have graced my life.

 
 
Jan_CAN
 
Avatar
 
 
Jan_CAN
Total Posts:  1355
Joined  21-10-2016
 
 
 
12 July 2017 12:48
 
Cheshire Cat - 12 July 2017 12:27 PM
Jan_CAN - 12 July 2017 12:16 PM

It’s not only relevant to men’s health, but also their partner’s health, possibly.

Male Circumcision Cuts Women’s Cervical Cancer Risk
Study Shows Circumcision May Help Reduce Spread of HPV

This is good news then.
I don’t mind giving up a little intensity of feeling as long as it’s for the benefit of all the lovely women who have graced my life.

That’s because you’re one of the good guys.  wink

[ Edited: 12 July 2017 13:06 by Jan_CAN]
 
 
jdrnd
 
Avatar
 
 
jdrnd
Total Posts:  5293
Joined  25-08-2009
 
 
 
12 July 2017 17:28
 
Dumaya - 11 July 2017 05:47 PM

COCK-BUTCHERING.

...There!  I said it!  Screw your “offence”!  I’m out and proud!  I named names!  I called out the Devil by His title!  I broke the Voldermort’s spell!  FREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEDOMMMMMMMMMMMMM!!

*recomposes self*

A hackneyed harranguing of what are literally endless inconsistencies, incongruities, ‘irreconcilabilities’, contradictions, hypocrisies, asininities and patently pea-brained promulgations of religion, would be treading over a track long beaten into fine, desiccated, holy desert dust.  Thus, the leave-your-brain-at-the-door, ‘path of least neural resistance’ schmatta shtick of religion, is not the dead horse carcass I am looking to flog here, my fellow Gungan Jedi Academy rejects.

What I instead seek is a solution to this specific, Age-old ‘riddle of the shmecky’:


HOW DOES ONE QUALIFY THE NOTION OF AN INDEFECTABLE, INFALLIBLE, OMNISCIENT ENTITY — THE VERY DEFINITION OF THE HUMAN WORD ‘PERFECT’ — AN ‘IMMENSITY’ WHO, WITHIN COMPREHENSIBLE HUMAN COGNITION AND BEYOND, WHO ASCENDS ANY ERROR AND ALL REPROACH, IN EVERY CONCEIVABLE WAY — SOMEHOW, SOME WAY, SEEMINGLY SUFFERS FROM AN ABJECT INABILITY TO CONJURE A WORKING INCARNATION OF THE MALE PUDENDA — SUCH THAT HIS WORK IS NOT IN IMMEDIATE, DIRE AND EXIGENT NEED OF POST-NATAL MUTILATION—AT THE CUMBERSOME, SIMIAN, BARELY-PREHENSILE PAWS OF ITS FLAWED-BY-DESIGN, SIN SOUSED, VAINGLORIOUS, ARROGANT CHILDREN…!?


Let it be know:  I am here to be enlightened.  I am a tableau rasa that lays supine for etching.  I yearn for the intellectually emancipating embrace of “His” logic and reason.  I submit myself to the injection of “His” ineffable intelligence.  I supplicate for the de-obfuscation this miasma of mordant, misguided doubt that diabolically clouding man’s mind.  Esuriently, I salivate to sup upon our saviour’s sap of supra-sentience.  O, Lord!  Silence the chorus of cynicism that every nescient, neural fibre croons in concert to deave mine ears to your immaculate, ecclesiastical refrain of ethereal edification.  I - LONG - TO - BE - SAVED!!

tl;dr / u wot, m8?!
“God” is the embodiment of perfection, but “He(o, the irony!) cannot correctly construct a damn cock!  We profess to love our children, but then subject them to unashamëd inguinal torture, whilst in their nadir of vulnerability — and then discursively excuse our sadism through shallow verbiage of “rights” and “culture”.  We elevate “God” above all human foibles, yet we must cede to “His” seeming base, penile prepuce fetishism.  The Judaic origins of this barbarism, even involve the oral exsanguination of the infant’s inguinal wound, by its surgical scimitar wielding aggressor (“metzitzah b’peh”).  An Islamic variant that unarguably further cements the uniform, strident phallocentricty of its own already primordial interpretation of the pertaining dogma.  The Christian copycats in-ironic dedication to this cruel child abuse, reconciled with their absurd notions of ‘pro-life’ and anti-abortion catatonia.  The increasing empirical evidence of circumcision contributing to the pervasion of a pornographic society, and the ensuing prevalence of “gonzo” extremes, which ingravescently strive to sate the [thus] scarred, stultified male sexual insatiability — inherently promoting an undercurrent of misogyny — exacerbating what is finally being confronted as an already fundamentally incompatible male-female sexual satisfaction (compared: procreation) dynamic…
Why - is - this - all - still - allowed?!

inb4 ‘lunatics are running the asylum’ ¯\(v_v)/¯

My only objection to this post is the use of the word “Dire”.

Other than that,

carry-on.

 
Poldano
 
Avatar
 
 
Poldano
Total Posts:  3152
Joined  26-01-2010
 
 
 
13 July 2017 20:19
 

This got me to thinking. Was Adam circumcised?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sistine_Chapel_ceiling#/media/File:Michelangelo_-_Creation_of_Adam.jpg

It seems to me Michelangelo didn’t think so.

wink

 
 
Dumaya
 
Avatar
 
 
Dumaya
Total Posts:  124
Joined  04-05-2017
 
 
 
14 July 2017 18:53
 
Cheshire Cat - 12 July 2017 11:16 AM

The idea was that bacteria could hide in the foreskin and cause health issues. I’m not sure if this is still considered to be true or not.

No, Mr. Altered-son.

That is the ‘hood’ pulled over your eye—to blind you from the truth:  The truth that you were abused like a slave; by those who you hold most dear; while in your most vulnerable state.  That you were born into bondage and immediately branded as a chattle—with the mark of the Je—BEAST, Mr. Altered-son.

There are no “bacterial issues”, or any such correlations associated with penises sporting intact, GOD-GIVEN foreskins; any more than there are with keeping one’s nose in place and nasal mucus accumulation.  This as much an old Je—WIVES tale as the “BBC” (*Google it) meme / myth is, and is no more rooted in reality than a notion that vaginal bacterial infections are fostered with the labia dewlaps remaining in place.  These are the “intelligent designs” of the disinformation-spreading godtards — zealous cultists who will stoop to availing any and all manner of base ploy and wile at their disposal, in order to justify their delusional, ideological bent.

From personal experience, I can tell you that I did not clean under my foreskin until sometime in my early tweens.  It was only when my father — himself a god-botherer (I know… just… no words) displayed enough nous to table (/ shower) the subject and proceed to demonstrate the ‘maintenance’ procedure required for the untainted male pudenda.  That is to say, (warning: skip ahead a few lines, if you’re squeamish) it was a veritable fromage factory down there!... Once I managed to gain access, that is (*minor pseudo phimosis which needed circumventing—redressed via a few nights of de-tumesced foreskin retraction / dermal elasticity encouragement / ‘MacGyvering’).  Yet, despite the ‘neglect’, there were no signs—-nor any history—of anything even approaching any so-called “bacterial infection”.  Astronomically lucky, I must have been… and high Midi-chlorian count… yes.

The sebum the body excretes through its dermal pours (in the case of the penile gland: smegma), is a naturally-produced emollient which evolution has developed over millennia, in order to maintain skin elasticity and to prevent the drying-out of the skin.  It occurs all over the body and is only ever viewed as ‘different’ (when it comes to the penile gland) because of its concentration—as an offshoot of the protective prepuce that said part of the anatomy is naturally sheathed in.  A billion-dollar industry exists that profiteers off of this very concept of epidermal ‘emolliation’ — something that the human body has long addressed… free of charge!  This just is an example of the level of cognitive dissonance at play here.

Forgetting, for a moment, the tongue-in-cheek diatribe of asinine religious prescriptions and predications for inquisitorial prosecution of the penile prepuce; to justify the excision of the highly sensitive, erogenous zone (*contains 20,000-some nerves) in question, on the gratuitously gormless grounds of medical necessity — in anything but the most dire, diagnosed cases of genuine phimosis (*see above embedded link for actual phimosis vs. ‘fauxmosis’) — is scientific quackery on a scale to rival climate science denial and ‘flat Earth’ theory!  The fact that multitudes of parents still fall for this tripe — and the largess granting of a prior benefit of the doubt, that they are not i fact vindictively passing the diabolical brand on to their progeny, in a display of post-utero spite—for the abuse they themselves suffered, at their budding mohels’ molesting claws (too long a bow…?) — is testament to the effectiveness of Jesuits’ ‘give a 7-year-old / get an automaton’ aphorism.

Lest we forget that we “love” our children… [cackles Semitically]

 
Dumaya
 
Avatar
 
 
Dumaya
Total Posts:  124
Joined  04-05-2017
 
 
 
14 July 2017 19:13
 

>the HPV meme
>oral sex causes mouth cancer
>anal prolapse in young girls is due to porn (as distinct from ignorance of sex / sexuality, stemming from its puritanical stigmatisation)

...and so on.

How many people know that the use of condoms increases the risk of bacterial accumulation and disease transmission by a factor of three(3)¹?  Do people know why said information is not promulgated—as one would expect it would be—given STD catatonia?
(¹Where sex partners are tested to be ‘clear’ of existing STD’s.) 

If not, I suggest watching this: After Porn Ends 2 (2017)

(NB: Any “research” correlating intact foreskin and whatever du jour, inimical offshoot happens to be peddled, must be taken in strict context.  The statistics presented are purely sample-based studies {no direct, traceable linkage has been made}, therefore highly regionally skewed, wholly dependant on sample sizes and usually highly biased in favour of those conducting the sampling — simile: a tobacco-lobby-funded studies into whether tobacco causes cancer — thus, should be caked in salt before digestion.

Accepting these “studies” as irrefutable fact, is tantamount to claiming all Moslems are budding, itching Daesh recruits — when it is now understood that 70% of those who joined said death dervishes, weren’t even espoused Moslems…!

...And that’s all to say nothing of the [notionally] No.1, irreconcilable idiocy of circumcision advocation:
THE SECOND-GUESSING OF BOTH EVOLUTION AND “GOD”!

Pray tell, how did any non Avrahamic-aligned / influenced / aping homo-sapien group on the planet, ever survive without this purported, ambrosial disease-staving technique?  Moreover, what happened before the ‘anti-sensitivite’ führer, Moses, descended from Mt. Sinai, with Yahweh’s pearls of weiner wizening wisdom — did the foreskin just ‘shed’, à la a snake’s skin or drop-tail lizard’s tail…?

Genuflecting, gormless goyim, please…

[ Edited: 24 July 2017 04:35 by Dumaya]