4 of 4
The relationship between science and religion
has been artificial since DesCartes 0
is a dichotomy 3
can be seen holisticly if we remove ourselves from the constraints of each discipline 0
all of the above 3
Total Votes: 6
You must be a logged-in member to vote
This is about science, religion, and philosophy:new member
Posted: 29 September 2008 09:10 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 46 ]  
Sr. Member
Total Posts:  2927
Joined  2006-12-17
Salt Creek - 29 September 2008 11:46 AM

Promotion of a theory of everything is always premature.

You missed a rhetorical opportunity, so if I may amend the above: Ejaculatory promotions of a theory of everything are always premature.

Posted: 29 September 2008 09:14 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 47 ]  
Sr. Member
Total Posts:  2492
Joined  2008-04-05


I think science has disproved the supernatural world.

So, which one do I vote for? grin

But I am not sure reductionist physics explains how the human heart pumps blood.

So then, maybe I believe god is an exaptationist and a preadaptationist?

Hell I dunno. Maybe I’ll just go with what SC says. grin


‘Every reflecting mind must acknowledge that there is no proof of the existence of a Deity’

‘If ignorance of nature gave birth to gods, knowledge of nature destroys them’

Percy Bysshe Shelley

4 of 4
RSS 2.0     Atom Feed