< 1 2 3 4 > 
 
   
 

Christianity… Where’s the REAL proof?

 
CalmWind
 
Avatar
 
 
CalmWind
Total Posts:  870
Joined  01-08-2006
 
 
 
01 July 2009 13:16
 
seeking_truth - 01 July 2009 11:54 AM

But if a supernatural, all powerful being is acting as a “helper” in these marriages - the results would not look as they do.  The statistics would be MUCH different.

Iran, divorce rate: about 10% Just saying. It’s the Homer Simpson thing. Maybe the Christians picked the wrong god and every day now they’re making him madder and madder.  LOL  tongue laugh

 
 
GAD
 
Avatar
 
 
GAD
Total Posts:  15240
Joined  15-02-2008
 
 
 
01 July 2009 13:36
 
CalmWind - 01 July 2009 05:16 PM
seeking_truth - 01 July 2009 11:54 AM

But if a supernatural, all powerful being is acting as a “helper” in these marriages - the results would not look as they do.  The statistics would be MUCH different.

Iran, divorce rate: about 10% Just saying. It’s the Homer Simpson thing. Maybe the Christians picked the wrong god and every day now they’re making him madder and madder.  LOL  tongue laugh

No, it’s the Mormons who got it right, I saw it on South Park…

 
 
clayforHim648
 
Avatar
 
 
clayforHim648
Total Posts:  1221
Joined  16-09-2007
 
 
 
01 July 2009 17:34
 

Here is a good article explaining a little further what I’ve tried to present…

 
 
GAD
 
Avatar
 
 
GAD
Total Posts:  15240
Joined  15-02-2008
 
 
 
01 July 2009 17:51
 
clayforHim648 - 01 July 2009 09:34 PM

Here is a good article explaining a little further what I’ve tried to present…

Oh, puke, god was that nauseating to read.

 
 
Elvar
 
Avatar
 
 
Elvar
Total Posts:  1
Joined  01-03-2008
 
 
 
01 July 2009 22:17
 
clayforHim648 - 30 June 2009 07:43 PM

After doing a little research, the most recent statistics I could find are actually on my side!


I imagine some % of those Christians that don’t divorce even though inside they may want to probably don’t for fear of god punishing them. Non-believers don’t have that problem and I truly believe that plays a role, though no idea how much.

 
bigredfutbol
 
Avatar
 
 
bigredfutbol
Total Posts:  5263
Joined  05-04-2006
 
 
 
02 July 2009 07:27
 
clayforHim648 - 30 June 2009 07:43 PM

And I clarified why the goalposts had to be moved out of the stadium.  Looking for proof of God’s existence in marriage statistics is, I believe, a fool’s errand.  After doing a little research, the most recent statistics I could find are actually on my side!  And I still don’t think that’s really going to make someone believe or not believe in God.[/url]

Of course you don’t think that, because you’ve already stated that we shouldn’t expect your “faith” to have any measurable, real-world consequences.

And as for the statistics proving you right, you’ve really set the bar pretty low:

All adults 33% 3792
   
Evangelical Christians 26% 339
Non-evangelical born again Chrisitans 33% 1373
Notional Christians 33% 1488
Associated with non Christian faith 38% 197
Atheist or agnostic 30% 269
All born again Christians 32% 1712
All non born again Christians 33% 2080

The figures only support you if we accept the narrow definition of “Evangelical Christians” as correct.  Essentially, it appears that among a small subset of Christians who believe that divorce is a sin, the divorce rate is a whopping 4% below that of atheists and agnostics, who presumably don’t fear the religious consequences of divorce, and who have not striven to live a “Christ-centered” marriage.

Four percent.  Wow. 

clayforHim648 - 30 June 2009 07:43 PM

Read the context of Matthew 7:20, the passage you all were referring to about their fruits.  Jesus isn’t talking about reading the latest articles in Newsweek or checking out the latest polls.  He’s talking to his followers telling them who to look out for and be careful not to be deceived.  Verses 15 - 20 is a warning concerning false prophets and false teachers, wolves in sheep’s clothing.  Verses 21 - 23 is saying that not everyone who cries ‘Lord, Lord’ is really a believer.  He goes on to say that those who heed His words are the ones who understand:

“Everyone then who hears these words of mine and does them will be like a wise man who built his house on the rock.  And the rain fell, and the floods came, and teh winds blew and beat on that house, but it did not fall, because it had been founded on the rock…”  - Matthew 7:24-25

Yeah, it’s not about theological hair-splitting.  Seeking_Truth was simply pointing out that if such verses are correct, then we ought to see the people who truly believe this stuff and who put it into practice to “be that rock.”  And, I’m sorry, but being a rock should amount to more than a four-point swing in a poll conducted by an evangelical Christian organization. 

clayforHim648 - 30 June 2009 07:43 PM

Aside from the fact that polls actually do show a lesser divorce rate for Christian evangelicals (even lower than atheists, believe it or not), you can’t use these simple questionnaire polls to really understand what’s going on.  You need to meet and see real people who are submitted to God’s vision of marriage, as I’ve already said.  There is much fruit to be seen, as I’ve already shared with you.  And the fruit isn’t just a successful marriage, meaning one that doesn’t end in divorce.  That’s the lowest possible standard, but one commonly appealed to.  The “fruit” of a Christian marriage involves spiritual, vital growth and glory to God.  And that fruit is something that non-Christians will never understand.

If you really think that atheists like me are sheltered fools who haven’t grown up around, among, and with “real” Christians as you define them, you’re living in an alternate reality.  I’ve known plenty of Christians as you narrowly define them.  I’ve seen them in action.  I’ve even been close to some of them.  Life isn’t a sci-fi movie.  I don’t need special glasses to see you as you really are.  (“you being general here, I don’t mean YOU specifically)

 
 
clayforHim648
 
Avatar
 
 
clayforHim648
Total Posts:  1221
Joined  16-09-2007
 
 
 
02 July 2009 12:00
 

The figures only support you if we accept the narrow definition of “Evangelical Christians” as correct.  Essentially, it appears that among a small subset of Christians who believe that divorce is a sin, the divorce rate is a whopping 4% below that of atheists and agnostics, who presumably don’t fear the religious consequences of divorce, and who have not striven to live a “Christ-centered” marriage.

we’re still going around in circles…

The point of the statistics is only to show that there is a close tie between traditional, historical Christianity and the perseverence of marriage/lack of divorce.  The drift away from historical biblical doctrine seems to show a greater likelihood of divorce…notice the definition of “Christian evangelical” in the report.  Also read the article on marriage I provided above. 

Yeah, it’s not about theological hair-splitting.  Seeking_Truth was simply pointing out that if such verses are correct, then we ought to see the people who truly believe this stuff and who put it into practice to “be that rock.”  And, I’m sorry, but being a rock should amount to more than a four-point swing in a poll conducted by an evangelical Christian organization.

The poll is not measuring (and it would be near impossible to measure) the “practice” or actual commitment to the views, only espousal to the views themselves.  Again, this is why the polls really can’t show much of anything. 

[quote)
If you really think that atheists like me are sheltered fools who haven’t grown up around, among, and with “real” Christians as you define them, you’re living in an alternate reality.  I’ve known plenty of Christians as you narrowly define them.  I’ve seen them in action.  I’ve even been close to some of them.  Life isn’t a sci-fi movie.  I don’t need special glasses to see you as you really are.  (“you being general here, I don’t mean YOU specifically)

I don’t think that at all.

 
 
SkepticX
 
Avatar
 
 
SkepticX
Total Posts:  13971
Joined  24-12-2004
 
 
 
02 July 2009 12:07
 
clayforHim648 - 02 July 2009 04:00 PM

we’re still going around in circles…


No, Clay, you’re going around in circles. Various skeptics are explaining why you’re off course and you keep “correcting” and going around in circles as a result. The skeptics are displaying immense patience, waiting to see if you’ll ever get a single course correction right and stop going in circles.

Personally I’m just dropping by from time-to-time because I find it amusing that they’re still holding out hope, after how many countless revolutions ... of course it could be they’re just amused as well.

 
 
clayforHim648
 
Avatar
 
 
clayforHim648
Total Posts:  1221
Joined  16-09-2007
 
 
 
02 July 2009 12:09
 

Personally I’m just dropping by

Thanks for dropping by…

 
 
Keep The Reason
 
Avatar
 
 
Keep The Reason
Total Posts:  1108
Joined  07-08-2007
 
 
 
02 July 2009 15:01
 
GAD - 01 July 2009 09:51 PM

Oh, puke, god was that nauseating to read.

No kidding.  When one begins by suggesting that sexuality is an “immorality”, one is already deeply broken psychologically.  Sex is a function of procreation.  It’s no different from eating, breathing, or even shitting.  It’s simply a function.  These theists heap sin all over it (they don’t heap sin on breathing though), and think that because they say it’s immoral, it must be.

It’s crazy, plain and simple.

 
 
clayforHim648
 
Avatar
 
 
clayforHim648
Total Posts:  1221
Joined  16-09-2007
 
 
 
03 July 2009 12:22
 

When one begins by suggesting that sexuality is an “immorality”, one is already deeply broken psychologically.  Sex is a function of procreation.  It’s no different from eating, breathing, or even shitting.  It’s simply a function.  These theists heap sin all over it (they don’t heap sin on breathing though), and think that because they say it’s immoral, it must be.

Straw man?

 
 
mesomorph
 
Avatar
 
 
mesomorph
Total Posts:  626
Joined  15-06-2006
 
 
 
19 July 2009 14:50
 
clayforHim648 - 24 June 2009 01:48 PM

When I said that I’m in one such marriage in my last post, I didn’t really mean that I have a happy marriage.  In many ways I have a extraordinarily difficult marriage.

Whatever they say about you Clay, they can’t say you don’t try to be honest. You are in good company. Atheists are honest. They don’t need to be anything else - they don’t have to pretend, or make up excuses, or try to prove the unproveable. So keep trying hard to be as honest as possible. Really.

By the way, excuse my nosiness, but I can’t help wondering what it is about you that your wife doesn’t like.

 
 
clayforHim648
 
Avatar
 
 
clayforHim648
Total Posts:  1221
Joined  16-09-2007
 
 
 
20 July 2009 07:52
 

Whatever they say about you Clay, they can’t say you don’t try to be honest. You are in good company. Atheists are honest. They don’t need to be anything else - they don’t have to pretend, or make up excuses, or try to prove the unproveable. So keep trying hard to be as honest as possible. Really.

Atheists are mixed bag, just like Christians.  That’s why I don’t debate personality traits, I try to debate the issues. 

By the way, excuse my nosiness, but I can’t help wondering what it is about you that your wife doesn’t like.

You’re a funny man.  Believe it or not, most people get along with me pretty well.  My wife doesn’t like Led Zeppelin though, so that has always driven a wedge between us smile

 
 
mesomorph
 
Avatar
 
 
mesomorph
Total Posts:  626
Joined  15-06-2006
 
 
 
20 July 2009 15:00
 
clayforHim648 - 20 July 2009 11:52 AM

I try to debate the issues.

Seems like you might need some help then. Here is a little tip.

I read the article at the link you gave above. In directing us to it you are trying to prove your case by employing terms of reference that you ought to know we don’t accept.

It’s like a US tourist in England assuming that they can pay for their taxi fare with US dollars. ‘Sorry madam, we don’t accept that currency here.’ ‘Oh really? I didn’t know that.’

Every single religious apologist on this forum makes this mistake. Which is rather odd, because you seem like quite intelligent people in many ways.

[ Edited: 20 July 2009 15:04 by mesomorph]
 
 
wahoo
 
Avatar
 
 
wahoo
Total Posts:  287
Joined  05-10-2008
 
 
 
21 July 2009 15:39
 
Keep The Reason - 02 July 2009 07:01 PM
GAD - 01 July 2009 09:51 PM

Oh, puke, god was that nauseating to read.

No kidding.  When one begins by suggesting that sexuality is an “immorality”, one is already deeply broken psychologically.  Sex is a function of procreation.  It’s no different from eating, breathing, or even shitting.  It’s simply a function.  These theists heap sin all over it (they don’t heap sin on breathing though), and think that because they say it’s immoral, it must be.

It’s crazy, plain and simple.

And what happens when an individual eats too much?

Sex is a normal human function.  But it is also something with which people can become obsessed.  The notion that sex has a place in a monogamous relationship is not unreasonable.  For the Christian this has its roots in God’s ordination of marriage.  One could certainly have these same values without appealing to religion as the source.

Clay’s argument is at least internally consistent in that, in keeping with biblical authority, loyalty to God is an important part of marriage. 

That is a rock on which most others here will not stand.  I would say that the divorce rate among those living according to the faith (not just nominally) would be significantly lower than that for nonChristians.  But that would be difficult to prove statistically because sampling would be subjective. 

Please note that this does not intend to say that a couple cannot have a mutually devoted relationship without God.

[ Edited: 21 July 2009 15:46 by wahoo]
 
 < 1 2 3 4 >