The Young America’s Foundation spokesman Jason Mattera addressed a breakout session called “Turning The Tide In Your Generation.” In his comments, Mattera evoked the battle of David against Goliath as a metaphor for conservative college students who are ‘persecuted’ by the big bad liberals who control academia. While discussing that theme, Mattera took the opportunity to argue for the supremacy of conservatism by saying, “our women are hot”:
During the panel, Mattera took the David and Goliath metaphor another perverse step: If conservatives (David) smite liberals (Goliath), they will be rewarded with the hot conservative women, just like King Saul promised his daughter to the warrior who slew the evil giant. “You know his daughter must have been beautiful because there’s no guy whose gonna die for an ugly girl,” Mattera chortled. “Our women are hot. We have Michelle Malkin. Who does the left have, Rachel Maddow? Sorry, I prefer that my women not look like dudes.”
The clown also claimed David was Christian. Apparently belief trumps accuracy.
The Young America’s Foundation spokesman Jason Mattera addressed a breakout session Sorry, I prefer that my women not look like dudes.”
As I have contended for a long time now, Ann Coulter is actually Tom Petty. What a babe eh?
Wish we Liberals had one of those!
“Our women are hot. We have Michelle Malkin. Who does the left have, Rachel Maddow? Sorry, I prefer that my women not look like dudes.”
Why does this man feel that he has the right to comment on the looks of women in a political debate? Does finding a person physically attractive make her/his political points more valid? Because, if it does, you’re an idiot.
Look at Michelle Malkin and Ann Coulter. They are horrible people who say and do horrible things just to get on television and/or sell books. The fact that they are unattractive to many people is one of the least horrible things about them. Alternatively, the fact that some people find them physically attractive doesn’t mitigate their nastiness one bit.