Poll: Infant male circumcision which happens without that infant's consent is a human rights violation.
 

Yes

No

 

Infant male circumcision.

 
 
Avatar
 
 
Irfan
Total Posts:  5
Joined  29-12-2010
 
 
 
03 July 2011 00:51
 

Please vote.

 
BlackLight
 
Avatar
 
 
BlackLight
Total Posts:  10
Joined  13-06-2011
 
 
 
06 July 2011 00:12
 

We needn’t dismiss the studies published in recent years that seem to suggest circumcised males are somewhat less at risk for certain STDs than are uncircumcised males. It just strikes me as a procedure that an adult male can choose to have done to himself, should he wish.

 
 
Avatar
 
 
toombaru
Total Posts:  800
Joined  12-11-2010
 
 
 
12 July 2011 14:42
 
BlackLight - 06 July 2011 04:12 AM

We needn’t dismiss the studies published in recent years that seem to suggest circumcised males are somewhat less at risk for certain STDs than are uncircumcised males. It just strikes me as a procedure that an adult male can choose to have done to himself, should he wish.


Baptism is much more harmful than circumcision.
Males can function fairly well without a foreskin.
When one’s critical thinking is surgically
removed and the brain is doused in magical thinking
the person is condemned to a fantasy nether-world composed of
hope, fear and delusion.

[ Edited: 12 July 2011 20:27 by toombaru]
 
 
Avatar
 
 
toombaru
Total Posts:  800
Joined  12-11-2010
 
 
 
12 July 2011 20:29
 
toombaru - 12 July 2011 06:42 PM
BlackLight - 06 July 2011 04:12 AM

We needn’t dismiss the studies published in recent years that seem to suggest circumcised males are somewhat less at risk for certain STDs than are uncircumcised males. It just strikes me as a procedure that an adult male can choose to have done to himself, should he wish.


Baptism is much more harmful than circumcision.
Males can function fairly well without a foreskin.
But when one’s critical thinking is surgically
removed and the brain is doused in magical thinking
the person is condemned to a fantasy nether-world composed of
hope, fear and delusion.

 
 
Avatar
 
 
birdman
Total Posts:  20
Joined  24-03-2008
 
 
 
19 July 2011 13:31
 
BlackLight - 06 July 2011 04:12 AM

We needn’t dismiss the studies published in recent years that seem to suggest circumcised males are somewhat less at risk for certain STDs [clip]


We need to wholeheartedly dismiss & reject such studies.


My own views:
http://corvus.freeshell.org/psittacus/three/serotonin/nocirc.html


Others:
http://www.doctorsopposingcircumcision.org/info/HIVStatement.html


http://www.mothersagainstcirc.org/stds.htm


http://www.norm-uk.org/circumcision_hiv.html


http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread612273/pg1


http://fearofignorance.wordpress.com/2007/11/02/hitchens-on-circumcision/


http://mgmbill.org/

 
 
Avatar
 
 
tsahpina
Total Posts:  57
Joined  06-07-2012
 
 
 
10 May 2014 11:13
 

cutting a piece of ones body is simply not natural.
whatever animals dont do is unnatural.
cos humans are animals. intelligent and emotional,but still animals.
they shit and fart.
how noble.

 
 
Avatar
 
 
tsahpina
Total Posts:  57
Joined  06-07-2012
 
 
 
10 May 2014 11:16
 

toombary,i have noticed even before that your thought is always right. i am with you pall. i wander if you will dissapoint me…