Oh for fucks sake…

 
Unbeliever
 
Avatar
 
 
Unbeliever
Total Posts:  892
Joined  04-12-2007
 
 
 
14 January 2008 06:14
 
 
 
Unbeliever
 
Avatar
 
 
Unbeliever
Total Posts:  892
Joined  04-12-2007
 
 
 
14 January 2008 08:21
 

Note how they completely without guilt posts the fraud video of Dawkins and passes is off as truth.
Couldn’t he sue them for that?

 
 
 
Avatar
 
 
mcalpine
Total Posts:  805
Joined  28-08-2007
 
 
 
14 January 2008 10:44
 

Cameron and Comfort would crucify Jesus if they had the chance. They are evil incarnate. Satan and the antichrist. In fact, as an atheist, you cannot know how truly loathsome they are.

 
 
Avatar
 
 
SkepticX
Total Posts:  3255
Joined  24-12-2004
 
 
 
14 January 2008 15:27
 
mcalpine - 14 January 2008 03:44 PM

Cameron and Comfort would crucify Jesus if they had the chance. They are evil incarnate. Satan and the antichrist. In fact, as an atheist, you cannot know how truly loathsome they are.


Well, most atheists may not hate them as much as believers of competing franchises, but we more than likely have a much sounder appreciation for the particular evil they represent, because believers of competing franchises are effectively all guilty of the same evil, just to a lesser extent in many cases. They fail to recognize that evil, which is part of its insidious nature, and why it’s a singularly nasty manifestation.

Byron

 
 
The anti-theist
 
Avatar
 
 
The anti-theist
Total Posts:  200
Joined  08-06-2007
 
 
 
23 April 2008 17:29
 

These two idiots are sick!

Show proof of a dog having kittens or one animal turning into another. Are they misrepresenting evolution on purpose?

“Sicko” and “whacko” come to mind. Do they really believe this shit? Can anyone be so dishonest and misleading?

Dom

 
 
isocratic infidel
 
Avatar
 
 
isocratic infidel
Total Posts:  949
Joined  08-10-2007
 
 
 
23 April 2008 22:08
 
The anti-theist - 23 April 2008 09:29 PM

These two idiots are sick!

Show proof of a dog having kittens or one animal turning into another. Are they misrepresenting evolution on purpose?

Dom

Of course they are Dom.

Dawkins, in my estimation, (whatever that’s worth)  is smart enough not to pursue a libel (or malicious intent to misrepresent? ) lawsuit because as a public figure it’s far more costly and difficult… but I agree unbeliever, he really ought to.

Anyone want to get together to put together ‘a proof of evolution’ for the ten grand? Scientists and veterinarians have witnessed micro-evolution in microbes… seems evidence enough.

[ Edited: 24 April 2008 06:28 by isocratic infidel]
 
 
Mel Olontha
 
Avatar
 
 
Mel Olontha
Total Posts:  156
Joined  04-11-2007
 
 
 
24 April 2008 04:40
 
isocratic infidel - 24 April 2008 02:08 AM
The anti-theist - 23 April 2008 09:29 PM

These two idiots are sick!
Show proof of a dog having kittens or one animal turning into another. Are they misrepresenting evolution on purpose?
Dom

Of course they are Dom.
Dawkins, in my estimation, (whatever that’s worth)  is smart enough not to pursue a libel lawsuit because as a public figure it’s far more costly and difficult… but I agree unbeliever, he really ought to.
Anyone want to get together to put together ‘a proof of evolution’ for the ten grand? Scientists and veterinarians have witnessed micro-evolution in microbes… seems evidence enough.

I acctually think they just look for attention. We should try to ignore most of those guys and not give them publicity by suing them etc. It could however be very helpful to show the most extremists so that they discredit themselfs.
I think I have heard way too much useless drivel from priests, rabbies, imams etc. just because of this notion that they had to be debated. That gives them way too much credit.

 
 
isocratic infidel
 
Avatar
 
 
isocratic infidel
Total Posts:  949
Joined  08-10-2007
 
 
 
24 April 2008 06:24
 

Indeed Mel.

Doesn’t Sander have a name for people like C. and C? Let’s see… what is it?...  fuckwits. Yeah, that’s it.

Fuckwits.

 
 
Lapin Diabolique
 
Avatar
 
 
Lapin Diabolique
Total Posts:  1814
Joined  10-11-2006
 
 
 
24 April 2008 16:07
 
isocratic infidel - 24 April 2008 10:24 AM

Indeed Mel.

Doesn’t Sander have a name for people like C. and C? Let’s see… what is it?...  fuckwits. Yeah, that’s it.

Fuckwits.

Well, fuckwit is an abbreviated term.
These guys should be properly classified under Homo Fuckwitus Retardus.

 
 
 
Avatar
 
 
SkepticX
Total Posts:  3255
Joined  24-12-2004
 
 
 
25 April 2008 05:54
 

Ray Comfort and Kirk Cameron serve kind of like the shepherd moons or bodies in a planetary ring system. Believers with even the slightest shred of functional honesty regarding their religious beliefs are quickly repulsed by the knuckleheads. Only truly and deeply dishonest believers can muster up the levels of self-deception and intellectual depravity required to do otherwise, so Ray Comfort and Kirk Cameron (et al) serve to better define the lines of the truly lost causes and those that at least have some level of genuine concern for what’s real and true (i.e. those who have at least a shred of honesty and integrity).

If a given believer actually admits to being a Comfort/Cameron fan in terms of their apologetics I pretty much know there’s just no functional mind to deal with there, and most of the time such fans are actually proud both of their fandom and of their non-functional mind. Utter intellectual depravity is a badge of honor to the truly faithful and the deeply, seriously religiostupidified. After all, it does take some serious devotion and effort to pull it off. You have to develop that devotion to the point that you’re willing to essentially relinquish your own humanity in a very key sense—rejecting the primary means by which we’ve survived as a species (a species without much in the way of solid, physical, natural survival tools—no decent natural weapons or shelter). We have to understand the environment we live in and adapt it to us to a significant degree in order to survive, so the means by which we accomplish this effectively is pretty central to human nature. This is why religious faith is a very deep self-betrayal.

Byron

 
 
 
Avatar
 
 
eudemonia
Total Posts:  2492
Joined  05-04-2008
 
 
 
25 April 2008 08:08
 

Here is the 10 year old answer to this from talk origins. This is creationist claim 102.1

http://talkorigins.org/indexcc/CB/CB102_1.html

Bogus, as always.