< 1 2 3 4 5 > 
 
   
 

This is what we need to fear

 
GAD
 
Avatar
 
 
GAD
Total Posts:  15567
Joined  15-02-2008
 
 
 
21 January 2009 09:16
 
bigredfutbol - 21 January 2009 01:32 PM

Oh, ALL the Jews are responsible now?  Wonderful.  Hey, Rabbi Kahane was from Brooklyn—let’s kick all Jews out of the USA.

One nice thing about thread like this is that we find out what some of you really think.

I said no such thing. I ask you if that is not what the Jews believe. What’s even nicer is watching people make shit up about other people to justify their own beliefs.

 
 
bigredfutbol
 
Avatar
 
 
bigredfutbol
Total Posts:  5447
Joined  05-04-2006
 
 
 
21 January 2009 09:37
 
GAD - 21 January 2009 02:16 PM
bigredfutbol - 21 January 2009 01:32 PM

Oh, ALL the Jews are responsible now?  Wonderful.  Hey, Rabbi Kahane was from Brooklyn—let’s kick all Jews out of the USA.

One nice thing about thread like this is that we find out what some of you really think.

I said no such thing. I ask you if that is not what the Jews believe. What’s even nicer is watching people make shit up about other people to justify their own beliefs.

I don’t what “THE Jews” believe, and neither do you. 

Seriously, when you start to talk about “THE Jews” and compare them to the SS, you really need recognize that you’re in a hole, and then you need to resolve to stop digging.

 
 
GAD
 
Avatar
 
 
GAD
Total Posts:  15567
Joined  15-02-2008
 
 
 
21 January 2009 10:08
 
bigredfutbol - 21 January 2009 02:37 PM
GAD - 21 January 2009 02:16 PM
bigredfutbol - 21 January 2009 01:32 PM

Oh, ALL the Jews are responsible now?  Wonderful.  Hey, Rabbi Kahane was from Brooklyn—let’s kick all Jews out of the USA.

One nice thing about thread like this is that we find out what some of you really think.

I said no such thing. I ask you if that is not what the Jews believe. What’s even nicer is watching people make shit up about other people to justify their own beliefs.

I don’t what “THE Jews” believe, and neither do you. 

Seriously, when you start to talk about “THE Jews” and compare them to the SS, you really need recognize that you’re in a hole, and then you need to resolve to stop digging.

Read the fucking OT. The Jews believe that god will put them in control of the world. His human enforcers of his will on earth, hence my play on words with the SS crack!

Your not even trying to have a discussion, your just looking for anything you can use to demonize me to avoid having to have an argument.

 
 
bigredfutbol
 
Avatar
 
 
bigredfutbol
Total Posts:  5447
Joined  05-04-2006
 
 
 
21 January 2009 10:13
 
GAD - 21 January 2009 03:08 PM
bigredfutbol - 21 January 2009 02:37 PM
GAD - 21 January 2009 02:16 PM
bigredfutbol - 21 January 2009 01:32 PM

Oh, ALL the Jews are responsible now?  Wonderful.  Hey, Rabbi Kahane was from Brooklyn—let’s kick all Jews out of the USA.

One nice thing about thread like this is that we find out what some of you really think.

I said no such thing. I ask you if that is not what the Jews believe. What’s even nicer is watching people make shit up about other people to justify their own beliefs.

I don’t what “THE Jews” believe, and neither do you. 

Seriously, when you start to talk about “THE Jews” and compare them to the SS, you really need recognize that you’re in a hole, and then you need to resolve to stop digging.

Read the fucking OT. The Jews believe that god will put them in control of the world. His human enforcers of his will on earth, hence my play on words with the SS crack!

Your not even trying to have a discussion, your just looking for anything you can use to demonize me to avoid having to have an argument.

It’s impossible to have a discussion with someone who ignores what I say and keeps regurgitating the same crap over and over again.

 
 
Piero
 
Avatar
 
 
Piero
Total Posts:  69
Joined  19-01-2009
 
 
 
21 January 2009 10:36
 
teuchter - 21 January 2009 02:32 PM

Let me take a stab.  70% of British Muslims do NOT approve of such bombings.

And of the 30%, is that entirely religious, or is that at least partially political, or did anyone bother to ask?

It is nearly impossible to draw a neat boundary between religion and politics, and even more so in the case of Islam. And that’s part of my point: people whose lives are largely ruled by their religious beliefs will also conduct politics in the same way. Hence, they are not to be trusted to comply with the rules of the democratic game. Besides, you seem to believe we should applaud British muslims because a majority of them did not approve of the bombings. My point is that 70% is a scant majority for such an appalling act, even discounting those who said they disapproved out of hypocrisy.

It should be obvious to anyone that the central tenets of the muslim faith are incompatible with democracy. Why you insist on denying this is beyond me.

 
GAD
 
Avatar
 
 
GAD
Total Posts:  15567
Joined  15-02-2008
 
 
 
21 January 2009 10:43
 
bigredfutbol - 21 January 2009 03:13 PM
GAD - 21 January 2009 03:08 PM
bigredfutbol - 21 January 2009 02:37 PM
GAD - 21 January 2009 02:16 PM
bigredfutbol - 21 January 2009 01:32 PM

Oh, ALL the Jews are responsible now?  Wonderful.  Hey, Rabbi Kahane was from Brooklyn—let’s kick all Jews out of the USA.

One nice thing about thread like this is that we find out what some of you really think.

I said no such thing. I ask you if that is not what the Jews believe. What’s even nicer is watching people make shit up about other people to justify their own beliefs.

I don’t what “THE Jews” believe, and neither do you. 

Seriously, when you start to talk about “THE Jews” and compare them to the SS, you really need recognize that you’re in a hole, and then you need to resolve to stop digging.

Read the fucking OT. The Jews believe that god will put them in control of the world. His human enforcers of his will on earth, hence my play on words with the SS crack!

Your not even trying to have a discussion, your just looking for anything you can use to demonize me to avoid having to have an argument.

It’s impossible to have a discussion with someone who ignores what I say and keeps regurgitating the same crap over and over again.

You made a statement about Judaism, I ask you about their beliefs, you answered with some bullshit? Whatever.

 
 
bigredfutbol
 
Avatar
 
 
bigredfutbol
Total Posts:  5447
Joined  05-04-2006
 
 
 
21 January 2009 11:08
 
Piero - 21 January 2009 03:36 PM

It should be obvious to anyone that the central tenets of the muslim faith are incompatible with democracy. Why you insist on denying this is beyond me.

There are lots of people in America who hold beliefs which are incompatible with democracy.  Their ideas are to be fought and discredited, and the institutions and tenets of democracy must always be defended.  However, I don’t think that millions of my fellow citizens should be exiled, or that immigrants with bad ideas should be deported.  Here’s another idea which is incompatible with democracy—thoughtcrime.

 
 
bigredfutbol
 
Avatar
 
 
bigredfutbol
Total Posts:  5447
Joined  05-04-2006
 
 
 
21 January 2009 11:10
 
GAD - 21 January 2009 03:43 PM
bigredfutbol - 21 January 2009 03:13 PM
GAD - 21 January 2009 03:08 PM
bigredfutbol - 21 January 2009 02:37 PM
GAD - 21 January 2009 02:16 PM
bigredfutbol - 21 January 2009 01:32 PM

Oh, ALL the Jews are responsible now?  Wonderful.  Hey, Rabbi Kahane was from Brooklyn—let’s kick all Jews out of the USA.

One nice thing about thread like this is that we find out what some of you really think.

I said no such thing. I ask you if that is not what the Jews believe. What’s even nicer is watching people make shit up about other people to justify their own beliefs.

I don’t what “THE Jews” believe, and neither do you. 

Seriously, when you start to talk about “THE Jews” and compare them to the SS, you really need recognize that you’re in a hole, and then you need to resolve to stop digging.

Read the fucking OT. The Jews believe that god will put them in control of the world. His human enforcers of his will on earth, hence my play on words with the SS crack!

Your not even trying to have a discussion, your just looking for anything you can use to demonize me to avoid having to have an argument.

It’s impossible to have a discussion with someone who ignores what I say and keeps regurgitating the same crap over and over again.

You made a statement about Judaism, I ask you about their beliefs, you answered with some bullshit? Whatever.

Yeah, whatever.  I made statements about JUDAISM.  You made blanket statements about THE JEWS.  I pointed out the crucial distinction between a belief system or religiously-defined group versus individual self-described members for you—again.  You failed to grasp that crucial distinction—AGAIN.  “Some bullshit” indeed.

 
 
Piero
 
Avatar
 
 
Piero
Total Posts:  69
Joined  19-01-2009
 
 
 
21 January 2009 12:46
 
bigredfutbol - 21 January 2009 04:08 PM

There are lots of people in America who hold beliefs which are incompatible with democracy.  Their ideas are to be fought and discredited, and the institutions and tenets of democracy must always be defended.  However, I don’t think that millions of my fellow citizens should be exiled, or that immigrants with bad ideas should be deported.  Here’s another idea which is incompatible with democracy—thoughtcrime.

I would heartily agree, were it not for the fact that fighting and discrediting Islam is not to be recommended, unless you have some particular reason why you would want to die young.

 
bigredfutbol
 
Avatar
 
 
bigredfutbol
Total Posts:  5447
Joined  05-04-2006
 
 
 
21 January 2009 12:53
 
Piero - 21 January 2009 05:46 PM
bigredfutbol - 21 January 2009 04:08 PM

There are lots of people in America who hold beliefs which are incompatible with democracy.  Their ideas are to be fought and discredited, and the institutions and tenets of democracy must always be defended.  However, I don’t think that millions of my fellow citizens should be exiled, or that immigrants with bad ideas should be deported.  Here’s another idea which is incompatible with democracy—thoughtcrime.

I would heartily agree, were it not for the fact that fighting and discrediting Islam is not to be recommended, unless you have some particular reason why you would want to die young.

Speaking out against injustice, intolerance and irrationality is too important to be left to others.  And while I hope to live many more years on this moral coil, it’s been awhile since I’ve been called “young”.

 
 
EN
 
Avatar
 
 
EN
Total Posts:  19017
Joined  11-03-2007
 
 
 
21 January 2009 14:44
 

Is Lenin just cleverly hiding an erection in that picture?

 
Piero
 
Avatar
 
 
Piero
Total Posts:  69
Joined  19-01-2009
 
 
 
21 January 2009 15:58
 

Bigredfutbol and Teuchter: I’ll try to make my position clear. I am in favour of democracy, equal opportunities, peaceful coexistence and pluralism. However, extending those ideals to those who would destroy them is suicidal. Take, for example, the case of Ayaan Hirsi Ali, a Dutch member of parliament forced into exile because of continuous threats to her life, or the case of Theo Van Gogh, brutally murdered for making a film against the oppression of women in Islam. You may argue that it is unfair to blame muslims collectively for the actions of a few “rogue” elements. But I’m sure you can suggest no reliable screening method to determine who is a “rogue” muslim and who is not. Meanwhile, the simple truth is that in any country where there is a sizable muslim community, people will be forced into silence out of fear. Maybe 99% of them are peaceful, but people will still fear them because it takes just one fanatic to murder you. It is happening right now even in the USA: remember the Mohammed cartoons fiasco? How many American newspapers published them? Do I hear “none”? And I won’t even mention Salman Rushdie, because every time I remember him my blood boils, not so much because of the islamic fatwa issued against him, but because of the unbelievable cowardice of the West.

Islam is not like any other religion or ideology. Maybe there are a few Christians out there that would condone the execution of those who work on the Sabbath, but my guess is they are insignificantly few. By contrast, there are millions of muslims who would have gladly killed the cartoonists that “offended” their prophet. The West and the islamic countries have widely different histories, so it is fallacious to equate their religious beliefs and practices.

Suppose there is a strong muslim community in your town, and suppose many of the newborn girls are subject to clitoridectomy (the real horror behind the mendacious terminology of “female circumcision”). What would you do? Or suppose the muslim community leaders file a complaint against your children’s school because the history textbook depicts the prophet Mohammed. Or suppose your meetings at work have to be rescheduled because you muslim colleagues have to face Mecca and pray five times a day. When I was studying, one of my classmates was a muslim. He would suddenly lay a mat on the floor and start praying, loud and clear, so the class had to be suspended until he was finished. I was amazed: why should we have to adapt to his customs? Well, clearly because the lecturer dind not want to get into legal trouble: had he told the student to leave the room, he might have been sued.

I am not advocating the deportation of muslims. It would be ethically wrong and practically impossible. I do, however, believe that muslims are given far too much leeway, even when their behaviour contradicts everything that Western societies have managed to achieve since the Enlightenment. It should be obvious that religious beliefs have no bearing on legal rights, but so far Western authorities haver been more that ready to concede muslims privileges, sometimes out of sheer stupidity (cultural relativism, for example), sometimes out of abject fear.

 
SkepticX
 
Avatar
 
 
SkepticX
Total Posts:  14327
Joined  24-12-2004
 
 
 
22 January 2009 05:38
 
Piero - 21 January 2009 08:58 PM

But I’m sure you can suggest no reliable screening method to determine who is a “rogue” muslim and who is not.


Much like “rogue” humans who violate the social contract, sometimes egregiously.

Or do you think you have such a screening process for other humans, which would then make Muslims unique for the lack of such a screening method?

Byron

 
 
bigredfutbol
 
Avatar
 
 
bigredfutbol
Total Posts:  5447
Joined  05-04-2006
 
 
 
22 January 2009 05:52
 
Piero - 21 January 2009 08:58 PM

.

I am not advocating the deportation of muslims. It would be ethically wrong and practically impossible. I do, however, believe that muslims are given far too much leeway, even when their behaviour contradicts everything that Western societies have managed to achieve since the Enlightenment. It should be obvious that religious beliefs have no bearing on legal rights, but so far Western authorities haver been more that ready to concede muslims privileges, sometimes out of sheer stupidity (cultural relativism, for example), sometimes out of abject fear.

Two things:

1)  The original poster WAS advocating the deportation of Muslims.  More than deportation, actually, since she didn’t specify Muslim immigrants.  Second- and third-generation Muslims, as well as Indigenous Muslims, were not excepted from the discussion.  So I wasn’t making that up or bringing a strawman into the discussion.

2)  Ultimately, you seem to be arguing that secular Western democracies seem to have lost their nerve and are far too tentative and fearful about defending our own values—if we even know what they are anymore.  You’ll get no argument from me on that count.  Maybe we need to focus more on strengthening our own commitment to our values and beliefs,  first by knowing what they are and then by being much more vigorous in defending and defining the institutions and culture of inclusive secular democracy.  This seems to me to be a much better, and more heroic, strategy than screening a broadly-defined group of human beings out of fear and inability to fight back.  Democracy has ALWAYS had enemies, and it always will.  There will always be people without AND within who believe things which are fundamentally contrary to democratic values.  The key is not to hide from those people or to keep them at bay.  The key is for citizens and civic society to stand firm.  Otherwise we’re just Weimer Germany weakly and futily fending off the inevitable.

 
 
Piero
 
Avatar
 
 
Piero
Total Posts:  69
Joined  19-01-2009
 
 
 
22 January 2009 06:39
 

Bigredfutbol, I agree with you. I was not defending the original poster’s position, but only trying to present arguments in favour of a more decisive stance on the part of Western authorities. So your point 2 is spot on as far as I am concerned, except for one detail: consider, for example, the problem of crime. It is obviously rooted in inequality, marginalisation, etc. So a radical solution would involve a major change in an economic structure that breeds inequality and marginalisation. Does that mean we should do away with our police force? By the same token, concerning muslim immigration, should we sit on the fence until we’ve had time to focus on our commitment to our values and beliefs?

SkepticX, surely you can see the difference between your garden-variety criminal and a religiously motivated terrorist. Even members of a Nazi party are different, because they can be fought with the usual legal and political weapons, whereas members of a religious creed could be, but are not. And you must acknowledge that muslim immigrants are, because of their creed, intrinsically inimical to the values of secular democracies.

 
 < 1 2 3 4 5 >